My object for beginning this series of
articles is straightforward: I am often exposed to the ideologies of
atheism, anti-theism, and agnosticism in a variety of settings. I
have read, seen, heard, and interacted with many people who all have
reasons that they don't believe in God. While this may have been
something I would have looked positively on up until a few years ago
I have, after coming to believe in God, and then in Jesus Christ,
found them troubling. The arguments I am exposed to are very much the
same as the ones that drove me to deny God for years.
So then, my first task will be to
acquaint the reader with my own testimony; first of my departure from
the faith, and then of my return to it. Every two weeks, I hope to
give a response to a different argument and hopefully inspire
discussion in the meantime. It is important to be able to clearly
communicate across the divide between belief and unbelief, and what
better way to cross that gulf than to understand where the other
person is coming from?
I was raised in a Christian home. I
first confessed my faith at age 6, and I can honestly say that
overall my faith (although, of course, childishly simple) really
brought me true joy. It wasn't just like this Santa Claus or Tooth
Fairy joy, either. I really delighted in the thought of glorifying
God. I guess I began to doubt the concrete reality of God around age
12. I confessed myself a Christian, but really did all the things in
secret that most 12 year olds were probably doing. When I was 14, we
started busing to a church in the neighboring town. I was shocked at
the venom that was sometimes spouted from the pulpit about all the
people who were going to hell (I don't think I have ever since heard
the word “fagot” used so abundantly) , and after a couple of
years I started associating the attitude of that church with the
faith, itself. That was one of the first experiences to make me begin
to question God's existence. At age 16 I started studying other
religions, namely Eastern, and I renounced my faith at 17.
Many of the reasons for my denying God
were very familiar to most of us. I was troubled most by the idea of
Hell. How could a God that was supposed to be Love itself consign
so many people to eternal punishment just because they didn't believe
in the right version of Him? Why would God allow so many of his
so-called followers to preach and act in so many appalling ways
unless they truly represented him or he didn't exist?
How can God exist if it can not
be proven scientifically? How can evil and suffering
exist in the presence of a benevolent and all-powerful God? Why
shouldn't I be able to do what I wanted and not have to deny myself
of the obvious pleasures of this world?
After
I renounced the idea of a God, I realized that I was the sole judge
of morality for myself. I decided that I would seek out my own moral
system. I would learn right and wrong as I went along. I liked
people, so I didn't renounce everything
I had been taught. I
wanted to be a good person, and I really hurt some people at different points
in my life, but I always tried to be a “good guy”.
I adopted for myself the position of
“Evangelizing Atheist” for years thereafter, always wanting to
free people from the oppression and ignorance of religion. I saw
religion as irrational, destructive and manipulative, and something
people just leaned on as a coping mechanism for a life they either
didn't understand, or couldn't handle. I saw Christianity and the
Bible as a means of controlling others and justifying injustices. I
did dabble in this and that; I played with magic, meditated,
experimented with drugs, and generally immersed myself in a fairly
hedonistic lifestyle. I can't say I felt empty or really consciously
longed for anything more. I was fulfilled in myself; there would
always be things I should improve, but I was happy with the way I
lived my life.
When I was about 22 or 23 I began to
doubt the basis of my complete unbelief. From the microscopic to the
cosmic, the beauty in the world all around us can be perceived if we
only look! The intricate
beauty of the tiniest flowers and insects, the sweep of color across
the sky at sunset, and the feelings they stirred up inside me serves
no evolutionary or naturalistic purpose I can think of; after all, we
are probably much more likely to be eaten by a lion if we are
stopping to examine every wildflower we pass, and sunsets should be
horrifying as they signify an end to security with the coming night!
Yet I see their beauty as being so profoundly real as to exist
outside my own mind. I also had a conflict when moral reality became
a solid fact to me. As far as I can see, everybody innately “knows”
the difference between right and wrong. Example: Most people “know”
that it is wrong to cause unjustified harm to others, and most people
“know” that it is right to save a drowning man even at risk to
one's own safety. This knowledge, however, is meaningless if there is
no central moral law
that exists as fact. If a moral law existed, there must be a moral
law giver. The idea that the universe “just is” may have been
appealing, but it became to me no less incredulous than the idea that
the universe “is, by the action of a Creator.” The moral law and
the undeniable metaphysical make this view incredibly plausible.
That
is when my presupposition shifted once more. I had gone from belief
in an Eternal Creator, to belief in an eternal physical reality, and
come back around to a sort of Prime Mover. I still wasn't calling
myself a believer, though. After all, no one could prove to me that
any sort of God existed. I was convinced of the existence of
something outside,
that there must be some purpose to creation, but it was not
necessarily conscious or possibly observable.
By now it had been
about nine years since I had renounced my faith in God. I started to
see spirituality as something universal. Although I acknowledged the
reality of the metaphysical, I felt that everybody had only their own
glimpse of what that reality really was. Nobody could really see the
big picture, and those who claimed they could were narrow-minded.
Questions
arose, though, what if God
is a
conscious being?
What if I
really am a “creature” and not just the byproduct of a cosmic
kettle?
Have I been
trying to create my own creator, rather than honestly seeking its
nature?
As I this through, certain implications were clear. First, if an
all-powerful being exists then I would have to abandon my
presuppositions both about its nature, and against its possible
intervention in the universe. Second, if I have been created,
what is my responsibility, if any, toward knowing why?
Spiritually
speaking I had already been pretty a' la carte, picking this concept
or that principal when they felt right to me. I started to become
interested in the Bible when I realized one day that the only
scripture I really knew was either what I had learned in Sunday
school years before, or the verses that I had a particular problem
with and would use to argue against it. Since the Bible makes a
direct claim to be the word of God,
I decided I would read it cover to cover, to justify my rejection of
its being the “true word of God” once and for all. I sat down to
read it as the chronicling of a people's history as they understood
it at the time, portrayed through oral tradition and later passed
down in written form (which, at the time, I saw as at most a very
drawn out game of “Telephone”). I expected to find snippets of
wisdom, as I would with any other ancient tradition, but also
expected gross inaccuracies and the “fairy tales” I had come to
believe it was filled with.
I came into the
Hebrew scripture looking for a chink in the armor, a hole in the wall
that I could exploit to disprove the whole thing. I was looking for
any theological contradiction I could find, anything I could point to
and say, “It's simple, really. See, right here: it contradicts
itself. How can an inerrant holy book have such a blatant
contradiction?” I honestly expected to find dozens of such gems, as
well as some generic, universal principles, which I could then share
with anyone else who might need their head cleared. Although there was a lot I didn't necessarily like, I couldn't say I found one. The God of the Jews and the Christians was, if nothing else, consistent in nature.
I was
startled, and then shocked, by the ring of truth that the Bible
sounded within me. All of the minute and mundane details that were
transmitted made the Old Testament understandable and accessible,
despite the gap of thousands of years between me and it. This was
not the stuff of fairy tales and legends! The Hebrews viewed history
as a scroll, unrolling slowly toward its ultimate end, and their
transmission of this history was meticulous and purposeful; it seemed
to be a sacred duty to tell the coming generations everything they
needed to know. It was through this lens that I found myself
attempting to look, in order to decisively knock the Bible down. It
was this view that ultimately knocked me down, instead. Everything
fits in scripture, a fact which I probably would've been able to walk
away from if not for the New Testament, specifically the Gospels. In
Jesus Christ I saw the ultimate culmination of all of scripture that
came before; and I did not just read it and analyze it, I experienced
it in my heart. I watched Jesus of Nazareth from his birth, I
listened intently to his words in the Sermon on the Mount, I saw his
trial in the Garden of Gethsemane, and his Crucifixion and
Resurrection. He convinced me not just of his existence, but of his
identity as the Son of God, of his call to me, and to all people of
all nations. In fact in Christ I found many of the answers to the questions I had asked myself before denying God initially. I admit I didn't make it all the way through before this
conviction occurred. I got to the end of the Gospel of John, and gave
my life to Christ.
So, if you are
interested, tune in next Wednesday, September 25th. I hope
to provide the reader with sound answers to the big questions about
belief in God, specifically the Christian God, and will begin with a big one: The question of evil and
suffering. Thanks for reading!
Thanks for reading, Beth, I admire your strength of faith! One of my biggest reasons for starting this blog is that, for me, faith was not enough at a certain point. I think it is important to know that the answers to hard questions, although maybe not always what we'd like them to be, are there; that while faith is necessary it does not have to be "blind". I am convinced that there is a reason that we can reason.
ReplyDeleteI will address the "religion" idea at some point, as well, so keep reading :) .